National Strategy for Counter-terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

National strategy for Counter-terrorism - Essay ExampleThe (FID) foreign internal defense are terms used in programs that are meant to any reduce or suppress the favorable conditions that would promote the insurgent conditions, in this overview the response and detection of potential acts or threats describe the principals of counter-terrorism. This paper argues that the overarching goals articulated in the National Strategy for Counterterrorism increase U.S. military involvement in the types of small wars. Small wars from the view of many theorists can be described as dissension between irregular and regular forces, this definition extends even to the encompass regular troops in different event or cases that demand their presences and responses like in variable context like in roles of national interest ,politics or culture. If the so-called small wars are analyzed from the political perspective, it is evident that the opponents whenever decide to survive their ground rarely suc ceed in direct pitched battles. As opposed to traditional rebellious tribesmen, the modern arenas of warfare record some irregularities in their adversaries. As compared to the past, the sole means was through psychological and political warfare. In this general understanding, success in small wars therefore must include potent means of undermining legitimacy of the adversaries. This means that small wars leave to include strategies ranging from peacekeeping, response, small-combating units, and operational as means of survival (Caraccilo 3). The small wars information is a remarkable modern counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, peace operations and separate irregular operations remarkable anticipation. In some cases like the argument passed by the United States on the Marines that best schema was to separate and intervene between warring factions through their negotiations and eventually reach an amicable settlement that does not involve fighting. The best strategy in other si tuations was to impose order, intervene and create new governments. In the latter, instance the fact that the overarching aim in the interests aligned new polity with the U.S. Nevertheless, the marine asserted that the sole purpose should be on the protection of the citizens and people through the government. These strategies in relation to terrorism are driven by extreme ideologies that often have global implications and possible new realities. These ideologies and violence embracing from the divergent responsible groups can achieve a reach globally. This new realitys stir is that there are diverse effects from the terrorist attacks on the countrys interest regardless of where there are issues or attacks occur (Ravndal 7). The National Strategy for Counter-terrorism articulate overarching goals of the countries involved, such as the U.S. military and its involvement in counter-terrorism strategies as described in article 8905. It shows that the effects of the small wars and the ne w realities brought in by terrorist attacks on the country. As such, the country is forced to constantly intervene in the interference. This causes drastic and negative effects since the contemporary conduct of the military activities that take sic in contested social norms and legal terrains, the engagement of military forces in armed conflicts conventions, antiterrorism, counter-conspiracy, enforcement of peacekeeping, law enforcement or stability operations result to deaths and even demolition of property. Through this, there is a dense mixture of law through